EPA Pressured to Prohibit Application of Antibiotics on US Agricultural Produce Amidst Resistance Concerns
A newly filed regulatory appeal from a dozen public health and agricultural labor groups is urging the Environmental Protection Agency to stop allowing the application of antimicrobial agents on produce across the United States, highlighting superbug development and illnesses to farm laborers.
Agricultural Industry Uses Millions of Pounds of Antibiotic Pesticides
The crop production uses about 8m lbs of antibiotic and antifungal pesticides on US food crops annually, with many of these chemicals restricted in foreign countries.
“Annually Americans are at elevated danger from toxic pathogens and infections because medical antibiotics are applied on crops,” commented Nathan Donley.
Antibiotic Resistance Presents Significant Health Threats
The overuse of antibiotics, which are essential for addressing infections, as crop treatments on produce jeopardizes community well-being because it can lead to antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Similarly, frequent use of antifungal treatments can lead to fungal infections that are harder to treat with existing medical drugs.
- Drug-resistant diseases sicken about 2.8m Americans and result in about 35,000 fatalities each year.
- Health agencies have linked “clinically significant antimicrobials” permitted for crop application to drug resistance, higher likelihood of staph infections and increased risk of MRSA.
Environmental and Public Health Consequences
Additionally, consuming antibiotic residues on food can disturb the human gut microbiome and increase the risk of long-term illnesses. These agents also contaminate drinking water supplies, and are considered to harm bees. Often low-income and minority agricultural laborers are most vulnerable.
Common Agricultural Antimicrobials and Agricultural Practices
Farms use antibiotics because they kill bacteria that can damage or destroy produce. One of the most common antimicrobial treatments is a medical drug, which is commonly used in healthcare. Estimates indicate as much as 125,000 pounds have been applied on US crops in a annual period.
Agricultural Sector Pressure and Regulatory Action
The legal appeal comes as the EPA faces pressure to increase the application of pharmaceutical drugs. The crop infection, transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid, is destroying fruit farms in the state of Florida.
“I understand their critical situation because they’re in serious trouble, but from a public health perspective this is absolutely a no-brainer – it cannot happen,” the advocate said. “The key point is the enormous problems caused by applying pharmaceuticals on food crops far outweigh the farming challenges.”
Other Approaches and Future Prospects
Specialists suggest simple agricultural actions that should be implemented first, such as planting crops further apart, breeding more robust varieties of plants and detecting diseased trees and quickly removing them to halt the infections from spreading.
The legal appeal gives the EPA about five years to respond. In the past, the agency banned a pesticide in reaction to a similar formal request, but a court overturned the agency's prohibition.
The organization can implement a restriction, or has to give a reason why it won’t. If the EPA, or a future administration, fails to respond, then the groups can file a lawsuit. The process could last over ten years.
“We’re playing the extended strategy,” Donley concluded.