🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.